Problems getting a visa to visit the UK

People living in the UK sometimes have trouble getting visas for family members to visit from abroad. While visa decisions depend on the individual circumstances, there are some common pitfalls that may explain a visa being refused. These include failing to provide enough evidence of meeting the criteria.

The main UK visitor visa available is called Standard Visitor. This allows people to come to the UK for up to six months at a time to visit family and friends, for tourism and for some other short-term purposes.

Certain business activities are also permitted, but visitors are not allowed to take up employment or self-employment. Nor can they switch onto a residence visa, such as Skilled Worker, while in the UK. If someone visiting the UK wants to stay long-term, they must leave and apply for the new visa from abroad.

Not everyone needs to apply for a Standard Visitor visa in advance. There are three different ways of entering the UK as a visitor, depending on nationality.

Citizens of countries on the ‘visa national list’ must get a visa (technically called entry clearance) before travel. These include Bangladesh, China, India, Pakistan and South Africa. Applying involves filling in an online form, paying £100, submitting supporting evidence and attending an appointment at a visa application centre abroad.

Citizens of countries on the ‘ETA national list’ do not need a visa: they can travel with just an electronic travel authorisation and request entry at the border. These include Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Legally speaking, the same immigration rules apply as for a visa application and refusal of entry is possible despite having an ETA. Such people may therefore wish to bring evidence of being a genuine visitor (see below).

Citizens of certain countries on the ETA national list can enter using automated passport ‘e-gates’, where available. In effect, the e-gate automatically grants the user a six-month visitor visa (they must leave by then even though they have no passport stamp). This is allowed for citizens of the EU, United States, Canada, Australia and several others.

The criteria for being granted entry as a visitor (whether entry clearance or at the border) are in the immigration rules.

Among other things, applicants must demonstrate that they are a “genuine visitor” (paragraph V 4.2 of the rules).

A common reason for refusal on this basis is that the immigration official is not satisfied that the person will leave the UK at the end of the visit. A core concern for the Home Office is that people may stay on in the UK illegally. Another common issue is failing to show proof of “sufficient funds” to cover the cost of the stay (which may indicate an intention to work while in the UK).

Home Office guidance gives more information on possible red flags for immigration officials. These include not being able to give a main reason for the trip; previously overstaying a visa in the UK or elsewhere; and lack of family and economic ties to the person’s home country (particularly if they have close family in the UK).

The onus is on the person applying to show that they are a genuine visitor (and otherwise meets the requirements).

UK residents often believe that they can 'sponsor' a visitor visa application by writing a letter to confirm the purpose of the visit. Such an invitation letter may be helpful but is not decisive. The Home Office guidance states that third-party support (including from an MP) “cannot be considered as a guarantee” that the person will leave at the end of their visit.

Simply asserting that the applicant has a strong incentive to return home after the visit – for example, because they run a business or own property there – may not be enough. Hard evidence should be provided, such as a letter from an employer or business registration documents.

The same applies to proof of sufficient funds, whether this is being covered by the applicant or the person they are visiting in the UK. Copies of bank statements would be relevant evidence, for example. There is "no set level of funds" required.

Yes. The Home Office stresses “each application is assessed on its individual merits”. But, statistically speaking, some nationalities are less likely to get a visitor visa than others.

From 2021 to 2024, citizens of the United Arab Emirates and Oman had the highest grant rates for visitor visa applications (at 99.4% and 98.2% respectively), closely followed by Kuwait, Qatar, Saudia Arabia and South Africa. The lowest grant rate was found among citizens of Chad (29%) and Botswana (32%), followed by East Timor, Algeria and Benin.

Source: Home Office, Immigration statistics quarterly: March 2025, table Vis_D02

There is no reason a Member of Parliament cannot write a letter in support of a visa application. But this carries no particular formal weight. The guidance says an MP’s letter “will be taken into account together with all other available evidence”.

Routine appeals against visitor visa refusals were abolished in 2013. An appeal may still be possible in limited circumstances where the refusal threatens to breach the family’s human rights. It is also possible to apply for judicial review (a separate and more expensive process).

In most cases, a formal legal challenge would require disproportionate cost and effort. People refused visitor visas can always reapply; this may work where the problem was a lack of evidence that can be remedied in a new application.

MPs cannot instruct the Home Office to reverse a refusal decision. They can draw attention to an administrative oversight (such as relevant evidence being overlooked) using the dedicated correspondence channel.

As a last resort, an MP can request that the Home Secretary issue a visa under discretionary powers, although this is unlikely to happen except in rare and compassionate cases. The Library’s briefing on Constituency casework: asylum, immigration and nationality has more information about ministerial intervention.