Alternative Fuel Payment Pass-through Requirement (England and Wales and Scotland) Regulations 2023

Considered in Grand Committee

Moved by

That the Grand Committee do consider the Alternative Fuel Payment Pass-through Requirement (England and Wales and Scotland) Regulations 2023.

My Lords, in moving the Alternative Fuel Payment Pass-through Requirement (England and Wales and Scotland) Regulations 2023, I will speak also to the Non-Domestic Alternative Fuel Payment Pass-through Requirement and Amendment Regulations 2023. These instruments were laid on 21 February and 23 February respectively and were debated last week in the other place.

The purpose of these instruments is to ensure that the financial benefits from the alternative fuel payment and the non-domestic alternative fuel payment schemes are passed through to end consumers. The non-domestic regulations also contain an amendment that corrects a drafting error in the Energy Bills Support Scheme and Alternative Fuel Payment Pass-through Requirement (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2023.

Before I begin, I thank the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee and the other place, all of whom provided helpful advice and feedback on these regulations. Time has not permitted us to incorporate everyone’s views into these regulations. None the less, we are grateful for the feedback that we have received. We will continue to explore and consider the comments that both the committees and Members of both Houses have given us, and we will consider how they can be reflected in the design of future regulations as well as current and future schemes.

The SLSC asked three questions. The first was on whether the effectiveness of the pass-through requirements of the other energy support schemes has been monitored. The second was whether there is any evidence of misuse of the application of “just and reasonable” by intermediaries to withhold the energy support from end-users. The third was whether there were any end-users recovering the energy support from their intermediaries via the courts system.

I thank the committee for seeking the Government’s assurance on support reaching the intended beneficiaries of these schemes, especially those who are vulnerable. We fully recognise that some groups, such as older people or those with different abilities, are most vulnerable to the increase in the cost of living. We are therefore continuing our dialogue on pass-through requirements with consumer groups and charities, such as Age UK, Shelter and MoneySavingExpert, so that all eligible end-users get the money that they are entitled to. I also thank the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments for its views.

In response to the unprecedented rise in energy prices that resulted from the war in Ukraine we have delivered critical support to households, businesses and other non-domestic consumers. Moving at pace, the Government brought forward emergency legislation on energy support last year, paving the way for support packages to be delivered rapidly across the entire United Kingdom. The domestic alternative fuel payment provides support to households that do not use mains gas, and which use alternative fuels such as heating oil. Eligible domestic consumers have received a one-off fixed payment of £200, paid via electricity suppliers. The electricity suppliers had until the end of February to provide the payment to all their eligible customers. Businesses, organisations and other non-domestic customers which use alternative fuel are receiving £150. These payments were made to electricity suppliers during February and March. Customers are already seeing these payments credited to their bills.

The instruments we are considering today are an important part of these support packages and of making sure that support reaches those who most need it. I appreciate that the Committee is already familiar with the purpose of pass-through requirements, as we have brought similar instruments to the Committee before. For those who may not be, let me explain what they do.

These instruments take the same approach as other energy schemes, in particular the energy bills support scheme and the energy bill relief scheme. They make it mandatory for intermediaries to pass through the financial benefit of the schemes to end-users. This is needed because we are delivering these schemes through electricity suppliers. In some cases, a supplier will have a contract with an intermediary and not the end-user of energy. For example, a supplier may have a contract with a landlord or with a heat network. When the supplier provides support to the intermediary, we need to make sure that it can then be passed on to the end-user in a just and reasonable way.

Let me clarify what we mean by end-user. In the case of both the alternative fuel payment and the non-domestic alternative fuel payment, an end-user is an individual who consumes energy or energy products—for example, a tenant who pays for their energy usage through their landlord. We are talking about tenants of different types: they can be domestic tenants, businesses or any other kind of organisations.

As with other energy schemes, these instruments require support to be passed on in a “just and reasonable” way. I know that the SLSC and Parliament have asked us what we mean by “just and reasonable” in these regulations. Let me clarify that matter and what we are working to achieve. The regulations have been drafted in this way to account for the many kinds of relationships between an intermediary and an end-user. If the Government took a narrow definition of “just and reasonable”, there is the risk of inadvertently excluding some intermediaries from the pass-through requirements. This also accommodates scenarios where intermediaries have multiple end-users to pass the support on to. They make it clear when and how intermediaries should communicate with end-users regarding the benefit being passed on.

Let me turn to the matter of enforcement.

My Lords, I hesitate to interrupt the Minister when he is on his feet but I am afraid there is a Division in the Chamber.

Sitting suspended for a Division in the House.

My Lords, I was just moving on to the issue of enforcement. The approach in these instruments is consistent with other energy schemes. If an intermediary does not pass on the benefit to an end user who is entitled to it, that end user will be able to pursue recovery of the benefit debt through civil proceedings. Should a court rule in the end user’s favour, they would be entitled to the payment plus interest. The interest is set at 2% above the Bank of England’s base rate.

The Government have published guidance on the GOV.UK website to ensure that requirements are clear to all parties. The guidance includes template letters to support end users, such as tenants, which they can use to contact their landlord should they be concerned about their energy bills. We are of course mindful of the concerns that this House and the other place have raised with us about enforcement. The Government will continue to keep the scheme under review. We will continue to work with a wide range of stakeholders to ensure that these pass-through requirements work for everyone who is in scope, including vulnerable groups. We want them to receive what they are entitled to.

In conclusion, these instruments are vital to ensure that support reaches the people it is designed to help. They are essential to the effectiveness of the alternative fuel payment scheme in Great Britain and the non-domestic alternative fuel payment across the United Kingdom. They will ensure that intermediaries pass on the support to those who really need it: those households and non-domestic energy customers who are most vulnerable to high energy costs. It is for all these important reasons that I commend these regulations to the Committee.

My Lords, I thank the Minister for a very full explanation of the SIs before us. I am pleased that the Government have fully caught up with the need to support consumers; I slightly disagree with the suggestion that this was done in a timely manner, but we and many others out there know about that. There was concern over a rather difficult period for the Government over the summer months but, on the back of this, I can underline that we will not oppose these SIs. We welcome them and want to see the help and relief that we have been discussing passed on, through the pass-through arrangements, so that people get the relief when they do not get the upfront sums directly.